You are currently browsing the Bioenergetic Spectrum Science Circle weblog archives for February, 2009.
- biochemistry (21)
- Bioenergetic Spectrum (28)
- Bioenergy (9)
- contest (1)
- Esoterica (15)
- Healing Science (24)
- Neurochemistry (5)
- Nutrition Spectrum (19)
- Organisations (27)
- Poison Spectrum (28)
- Public Health Hazard (7)
- Science Tools (3)
- Uncategorized (2)
- 26. February 2010: Protect Your Health against Flu Virus with UV Light
- 26. February 2010: Colloidal Silver Kills Swine Flu, H1N1 Virus and More
- 7. February 2010: The Key to Disease Prevention is a Life Miracle: Vitamin D
- 26. January 2010: We Need Health Care Reform with a Life-Positive Health Bill
- 20. January 2010: Conspiracy Theory: Haiti EarthQuake Natural or Man Made?
- 24. December 2009: Clinical Bioenergetics as the Holistic Cure to Disease
- 26. November 2009: Political vs. Scientific Perspective on Climate Change
- 24. November 2009: GULF ECO Expo and Conference set in January 2010
- 23. November 2009: New Age Guide to Healing Bioenergetics
- 14. November 2009: Doctors Against Dangerous Vaccinations
Bioenergetic Spectrum
Blogroll
Electrokinetic Spectrum
Nutrition Spectrum
Poison Spectrum
Psychoenergetics
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
Archive for February 2009
Healing Power of Music: Solfeggio Scale Tones
25. February 2009 by HealingMindN.
There is an update to the page on The Healing Power of Music: Music can influence the natural healing motility of genes, cells, and various structures in the body. Treatise on the Solfeggio Scale is included.
Above is a psychedelic music video incorporates tones from the full 12 Solfeggio frequency scale. The throat or overtone singing featured on this track is performed by Stian (a.k.a. “stingndr” on YouTube).
There is also Theta brainwave entrainment technology in this track by unisontherapy.com.
The Solfeggio Scale frequencies are from a musical scale used in ancient music, chants, and religious ceremonies that were lost for many centuries. The Solfeggio Scale
and its chants and frequencies or tones were believed to convey spiritual blessings and transformation when played and sung in harmony.
One of the most interesting Solfeggio Scale frequencies is 528 Hz. Genetic biochemists, according to Dr. Len Horowitz and Dr. Joseph Puleo, suggest this frequency is the repair frequency for damaged DNA. Therefore, 528 Hz is one of the main focus frequencies on this track.
There are nine main Solfeggio Scale frequencies. But it is the six initial tones that many have suggested are of the most benefit. Individual beliefs notwithstanding, as each note has a different tuning from the conventional musical scale, these tones can provide a new stimulus to the mind and physical system.
It has recently been accepted by some scientists that just providing the brain with new input has many benefits in relation to brain plasticity and keeping the mind young, healthy, and activated. As the mind becomes healthy, the physical body also reaps rewards.
The following is a list of some of the Solfeggio Scale frequencies in Hertz (Hz) and their benefits.
-
396 Hz - Releasing emotional patterns and the liberation from guilt and fear.
-
417 Hz - Breaking up crystallized emotional patterns and facilitating change.
-
528 Hz - “DNA integrity” transformation, love, and miracles.
-
639 Hz - Whole brain quadrant interconnectedness, connecting relationships.
-
741 Hz - Intuitive states, non-linear knowing, and awakening intuition.
-
852 Hz –Unconditional love and returning of spiritual order.
The 12 Solfeggio Scale tones follow a mathematical pattern. They increase by 111 Hz each note.
63 Hz
174 Hz
285 Hz
396 Hz
417 Hz
528 Hz
639 Hz
741 Hz
852 Hz
963 Hz
1174 Hz
1285 Hz
Learn more about healing tones at The Healing Power of Music.
Posted in Healing Science, Bioenergetic Spectrum | Print | 3 Comments »
National Cancer Institute Research Costs (You) Too Much
12. February 2009 by HealingMindN.
Here’s a bit of fiscal news from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Their asking for billions of dollars to look for “a cure” for cancer from the government:
Budget Proposal Highlights Progress and Opportunities in Cancer Research
Last week NCI released The Nation’s Investment in Cancer Research, an annual report intended to directly inform the President about the progress and opportunities in our continuing efforts against cancer and to justify the administration’s budget request to Congress for an additional $2.1 billion to fund the Nation’s battle against cancer.
At a time of great economic challenge, the report, which is often referred to as the “bypass budget,” demonstrates how NCI’s deep commitment to outstanding science benefits all Americans. As the 2010 report shows, cancer is a model for studying the biology of all diseases. It can also inform our thinking about the delivery of health care, the development of electronic medical records, and a health care system based on the uniqueness of each individual that employs a new generation of targeted therapies.
The Nation’s Investment offers NCI’s professional judgment on strategic programs that could hasten our research progress against cancer while also bringing new therapies, earlier detection, and better methods of preventing cancer to all people.
There is much work to be done. The burden of cancer is rising around the world, and by the year 2010, cancer is expected to replace heart disease as the number-one killer. The Nation’s Investment aims to be realistic while also showing how additional investments could be used optimally in the future.
For fiscal year (FY) 2010, NCI’s proposed budget to sustain our current level of activities is approximately $5.1 billion, while the proposal to accelerate progress is an additional $2.1 billion. By comparison, NCI’s FY 2008 budget was approximately $4.8 billion. Though we have operated with what has essentially been a flat budget for the last 5 years, we have actually experienced a significant budgetary decline due to biomedical inflation. When you account for this inflation over the last 10 years, our 2008 appropriation actually represented a purchasing power equivalent to $3.5 billion.This lost purchasing power has had serious consequences for the cancer research community and, by extension, our patients who carry this burden. In particular, we are deeply concerned about how these changes will affect the next generation of scientists, who are critical for maintaining our nation’s position as a global leader in science, and whose important work is an integral part of our economy.
Were it to receive additional funding, NCI’s first job would be to help increase America’s research capacity by funding scientists, fostering the next generation of researchers, and supporting the development of technology and infrastructure. The report also details how NCI strives to put its science to work for patients, such as our expanding drug discovery platform…
That was the magic phrase: “drug discovery platform.” did you see the previous article? I’m pretty sure that “Vitamins Don’t Help” is nothing but propaganda being used by big pharma against essential nutrients. You can tell who NCI is working with by that magic phrase: “drug discovery platform.”
I’ve already mentioned, and I’m not the only one who’s saying this: The technology exists RIGHT NOW to cure cancer; it’s an energy oriented, non-invasive cure. Problem is mainstream medicine doesn’t want this cure; it’s not drug oriented.
Today’s medical research professionals base their research in greed. You see, something like Rife Technology costs virtually nothing compared to prescription based drugs and other mainstream medical therapies.
The American Medical Association, the National Cancer Institute, the Food and Drug Administration, and especially big pharmaceutical companies don’t make any money from cancer cures that don’t use drugs. Their interests are based in greed. The people running these “health” departments prefer that everyone get on drugs and stay on drugs for the rest of their lives.
In reality, they couldn’t care less about any cure. They are simply interested in providing the illusion of health, so they can keep you hooked on their drugs.
Therefore, Dr. Rife, people who worked with him and others who researched and discovered successful energy oriented healing modalities are legally ostracized. Prescribed drugs kill untold hundreds of 1000’s of people every year. Energy oriented therapy has no death rate, has never hurt anyone, and has only helped people.
If you would like to learn more about curing chronic disease using unconventional medicine, please follow the link. Fewer and fewer dealers are offering energy oriented therapies for chronic ailments. We should take advantage before the FDA puppets for big pharma shut them down too:
Royal Rife’s Accomplishments With Cancer Using Electronic Frequencies And His Breakthrough Microsope Have Generated Quite a Bit of Confusion.
What did he do? How can this help you retain good health? New information shakes some common misconceptions. Don’t believe all the hype - instead learn the facts - Click Here >> the latest Royal Rife Information from researchers who care about you.
Posted in Healing Science, Organisations | Print | No Comments »
Propaganda: “Vitamin Pills Don’t Help” (cancer)
11. February 2009 by HealingMindN.
Here is the original article as I saw it in my local newspaper:
Vitamin Pills Don’t Help
They don’t curb cancer, heart risk
The largest study ever of mult-vitamin use in older women found they did nothing to prevent common cancers or heart disease.
The eight-year study in 161,808 postmenopausal women echoes recent disappointing vitamin studies in men.
Millions of Americans spend billions of dollars on vitamins to boost their health. Research has focused on cancer and heart disease in particular becaue of evidence that diets full of vitamin-rich foods may protect against those illnesses. But that evidence doesn’t necessarily mean pills are a good substitute.
The study’s lead author, researcher Marian Neuhouser of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, advised: “Get nutrients from food. Whole foods are better than dietary supplements.”
The study appears in yesterday’s Archives of Internal Medicine.
This is the article as it appears in most hard print periodicals. This is not the complete article. BUT, because hard print periodical publishers realise that their average readership has an attention span of only a few seconds per article, they probably figured that they would only provide the “essentials” - namely the headlines.
In essence, this is most likely propaganda by the big pharma against essential nutrients. In fact, this article is experiencing a big national wave across local newspapers and the web with several different incarnations.
Here’s the rest of the article excerted from CBS News:
Co-author Dr. JoAnn Manson said despite the disappointing results, the research doesn’t mean multivitamins are useless.
For one thing, the data are observational, not the most rigorous kind of scientific research. And also, it’s not clear if taking vitamins might help prevent cancers that take many years to develop, said Manson, chief of preventive medicine at Harvard’s Brigham & Women’s Hospital.
She said multivitamins still may be useful “as a form of insurance” for people with poor eating habits.
The study involved an analysis of data on women in their 50s and up who participated in long-running government studies on postmenopausal women. Almost 42 percent of the women said they used multivitamins regularly.
After about eight years, roughly equal numbers of vitamin users and nonusers developed common cancers, heart attacks and other cardiovascular problems. Overall, there were 9,619 cases of cancer, including cancers of the breast, lung, ovary, colon and stomach; and 8,751 cardiovascular ailments including heart attacks and strokes. In addition, 9,865 women died, also at similar rates in multivitamin users and nonusers.
Get nutrients from food. Whole foods are better than dietary supplements.
Marian Neuhouser, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Alice Lichtenstein, a Tufts University nutrition professor who was not involved in the research, said the study is important because it involved so many women.
“All the evidence keeps pointing in the same direction,” Lichtenstein said.
Eric Jacobs, an American Cancer Society epidemiologist, said while his group doesn’t advise vitamins to prevent cancer, it does recommend maintaining a healthy weight and eating at least five servings of fruits and vegetables daily while limiting red meat. Similar habits are also thought to help reduce heart disease risks.
As you see there was a different title and subheading here. When you look for this article under “Marian Neuhouser of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,” you’re going to find a number of different incarnations of the same information. It’s like the publishers want to drill the same information into the public mind in as many ways as possible.
Here’s one more example from PhysOrg where I made a comment. PhysOrg offered the most scientific incarnation, which I appreciate, but it still has the same failings as all the others:
- What kind of multivitamins were that 42% taking? For what purpose? How often?
- What kind of lifestyle including diet do those women have? Were they active? Docile?
- What are their family health histories? Their predispositions to disease?
- Are any of their working/living conditions carcinogenic in nature?
- Most important, what current drug prescriptions/medical therapies were they concurrently undergoing?
The reason I push essential nutrients for people who take regular prescription drugs is that drugs deplete essential nutrients in the body.
For example, statins deplete Coenzyme Q10, especially in elderly people who tend to experience CoQ10 depletions.
Pain killers destroy B vitamin, folic acid.
Vitamins are building blocks for the body. True: Whole foods are better than synthetic vitamins, but how many of us are educated about whole foods? And what is a “whole food” according to Marian Neuhouser?
I try to educate people on what a whole food is and how to grow your own at Mineralized Organic Superfoods. Here’s my question: Is Marian telling people that whole foods are better under the assumption that most people know what “whole foods” are?
Let’s ask our selves these important questions. How much of the general public is well educated in:
- Leading a healthy lifestyle?
- How to recognise and buy whole foods?
- Knowing which vitamins to use?
- Knowing what constitutes a health hazard?
Considering the unfortunate state of the greedy mainstream food industry, it’s very difficult for people to get their hands on whole foods. The mainstream food industry is NOT producing whole foods. The organic farmers who choose not to work with genetically modified organisms are slowly but surely getting squeezed off their farms or are forced to work with GMOs because of frivolous GMO lawsuits by Monsanto.
It’s simply too difficult for most people to get their hands on whole foods, unless they grow their own. This is the reason we take vitamins today, to make up for the depletion of vitamins and minerals in today’s food supply.
The truth is vitamins were discovered as being vital to the bodie’s functions and immune system. Here’s an excerpt from How Vitamins were Discovered:
..By the early 1900’s several teams of scientists were “hot on the trail” of the mysterious anti–scurvy substance. In 1931, a concentrate was made from lemon juice that was 20,000 times as potent as the original juice! Now came an intensive effort to discern the exact nature of this vital compound. Once its molecular “chain” or structure was determined, it could be synthesized and mass–produced. And so it happened that by 1935 vitamin C ( also properly named ascorbic acid ) became the first “pure” vitamin made available to the public through large–scale production…
You will see many studies at this page, real scientific studies that discuss the importance of our most common essential nutrients and the way they were derived.
When I see something like this “Vitamin Pills Don’t Help” propaganda, it’s like they’re trying to reverse the laws of nature. I find this mainstream scientific cretinism very disturbing and distressing.
I can guarantee you that the proliferation of “Vitamin Pills Don’t Help” is nothing but propaganda because it takes advantage of people’s short attention spans, it does not seek to educate, but proliferate rumors, and it only furthers the agenda of big pharma for the push of Codex Alimentarius which would have the debilitating effect of relegating vitamins to pitiful doctor’s prescriptions if not pitifully small dosages over the counter.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center should only be about cancer research - not creating rumors about essential nutrients. Guess what? There are cures for cancer. Vitamins are a good prophylaxis, but cancer is highly individual. There has never been a guarantee that vitamins prevent cancer.
Maybe some news program or doctor convinced you that someday there will be a drug oriented panacea for cancer. Impossible; it’s a mystical pipe dream. Unless we are talking about a public source of carcinogens that affect the living body the same way, cancer is highly individual. This means we have to destroy the cancer according to the kind of cancer the person is experiencing.
The Real Cure to Cancer
One doctor discovered a way to kill cancer cells non-invasively, decades ago. His name was Dr. Royal Raymond Rife. He worked with a number of doctors who helped him to verify his research.
Dr. Rife first used monochromatic light in something he called an ultramicroscope. This amazing microscope, which took all day to calibrate, could magnify a living object 60,000X. This is in direct opposition to electron microscopes which requires the sample to be dead to work.
It turns out that monochromatic light not only revealed living cultures at 60,000X that could not be seen under conventional microscopes, monochromatic light was also capable of killing these same cultures.
From monochromatic light, Dr. Rife proceeded to build a plasma wave device that could emit single, square wave frequencies in the mega-hertz region. It turns out that the plasma wave device had the same effect on his culture samples as the monochromatic sources of light. Fancy that.
This means that Dr. Rife discovered a non invasive form of energy that could be used to kill all kinds of bacteria including cancer cells.
You can read more about Dr. Rife’s Work at the following articles:
Short Bio on Royal Raymond Rife explains why energy oriented medicine and their researchers are segregated from a morally corrupt society…
Rife Ultra Microscope: Bacteria Chronicles
Royal Rife and colleagues utilizing his ultra microscope made revolutionary discoveries in bacteriology…
In fact, if you’d like to experiment using Rife Technology, the equipment is still noninvasive, but more advance. Future Tech even has a device that delivers eight frequencies at once, to save time. You lay on it, so it’s not going to mess with the FCC standards or anyone’s radio/TV. Check it out:
Royal Rife’s Accomplishments With Cancer Using Electronic Frequencies And His Breakthrough Microsope Have Generated Quite a Bit of Confusion.
What did he do? How can this help you retain good health? New information shakes some common misconceptions. Don’t believe all the hype - instead learn the facts - Click Here >> the latest Royal Rife Information from researchers who care about you.
Thanks for your time,
Healing Thoughts, HealingMindN
Randolph Directo
Addendum:
Cocktail of five vitamins may give cancer patients an extra two years
By Jenny Hope
Last updated at 4:37 PM on 16th February 2010Cancer patients with terminal disease who take a daily cocktail of vitamins could extend their lives by two years or even longer, claim researchers.
Three out of four in a pilot study survived an average of five months longer than the expected one year, and some were still alive three years after treatment started…
Dr Bob Lister, co-author of the study by British and Danish researchers, said the results were similar to the survival gains from new drugs and in some cases better.
But the important difference was there were no side effects reported by patients taking vitamins, he said.
Dr Lister, chairman of the Institute of Brain Chemistry and Human Nutrition at London Metropolitan University, said: ‘We believe these results are meaningful and justify trying to get backing for a proper clinical trial.
‘People with cancer are constantly asking what can we do, not necessarily to beat the cancer but to have a better quality of life whatever the length of survival.
‘Most importantly, taking these supplements is extremely safe, and there were no adverse reactions among the patients…’
During the nine-year period, the patients were treated with coenzyme Q10 - a vitamin-like compound-essential for producing energy made naturally in the body - and six other antioxidants including vitamins A, C and E, selenium, folic acid, and beta carotene (which was not given to lung cancer patients for safety reasons)…
‘Until we know for sure, our advice is to try to get the vitamins you need through a balanced and varied diet rather than through vitamin supplements.’
Unfortunately, most people are not educated on what “balanced and varied” means. Only holistic doctors and nutritionists are interested in educating people about proper diets. For the most part, this means YOU have to educate yourself. Fortunately, the altruistic doctors put their research on the web for our convenience. If you believe in free access to health supplements, then please visit Nutrition Spectrum for quintessential deals and information on essential nutrients.
Posted in Healing Science, Nutrition Spectrum, Bioenergetic Spectrum | Print | No Comments »
Reform the Food and Drug Administration
5. February 2009 by HealingMindN.
This post is a follow up to Stop the FDA Witch Hunt.
If you are a U.S. Citizen, then you can share your opinion of the effects that the FDA has had on the health and well being of every person in the United States.
In November 2007, a 60-page report titled “FDA Science and Mission at Risk” was released by the FDA. In this report, the agency admitted that it lacks the competency and capacity to keep up with scientific advances.
The FDA now admits that Americans are suffering and dying because the FDA does not have the scientific ability to ascertain if new drugs are safe or effective or to evaluate scientific claims.
These failures affect the health of all Americans. Good drugs are not approved or approved after interminable delays. Even after new drugs are shown to be safe, doctors cannot use them with terminally ill patients whose cases are otherwise hopeless. Bad drugs are approved — often on the basis of a recommendation by panels whose members include drug company consultants.
The record with the food supply is almost as bad as with drugs. When fresh food turns out to be contaminated, the only solution the Agency can come up with is to “nuke” it with radiation. What does this do to food? The FDA certainly does not know.
The FDA pushes forward, approving faulty and dangerous drugs and medical devices by the thousands and approving toxic chemicals for use in baby formula, baby bottles, and prescription drugs. Meanwhile, the FDA pursues what can only be described as a harassment campaign against those who want to rely on wholesome foods, dietary supplements, and lifestyle changes to achieve natural good health.
A veritable revolution is taking place in the science of food, food extracts, and food supplements. Food producers would like to tell the American public about it. Millions of lives could be saved as a result. But the FDA will not permit it. The Agency ignores first amendment protections and censors the communication of valid scientific information.
The epidemics currently plaguing this country — cancer, obesity, diabetes, asthma and allergies, and many other debilitating disorders — are linked to manmade products and processes that the FDA has approved and promoted. These failures have resulted in the sickest generation in the history of this country. The agency seems to have lost sight of its mandate to protect the public and has instead come to see itself as the guardian of corporate interests. It is time to end the many conflicts of interest linking the FDA to the pharmaceutical and chemical industries, conflicts of interest that betray the public and harm so many American consumers.
It is time to reform the FDA!
To persuade Congress to address the comprehensive failure of the FDA, the American Association for Health Freedom has drafted a petition to reform the FDA.
Simply go to ReformFDA.org and add your signature.
Posted in Poison Spectrum | Print | No Comments »
Is the Hidden Microwave Infrastructure Dangerous?
1. February 2009 by HealingMindN.
This post is a follow up to Colony Collapse Disorder Honey Bee Research and Bioenergetic Research on Vanishing Bees. It seems that school children must suffer the effects of a microwave infrastructure that school district officials chose to install without your knowledge:
Cell towers on school grounds: Reward or risk?
Associated Press • December 16, 2008
TAMPA, Fla. (AP) — For six weeks, hundreds of Benito Middle students had nowhere to store their belongings. The 300 students not issued lockers had to lug 30-pound bookbags, Principal John Sanders said.
To the relief of concerned parents, the school installed gleaming turquoise lockers in mid-October at a cost of $40,000.
But the money didn’t come from Hillsborough schools, PTA fundraisers or some other traditional funding source. As school budgets shrink, campuses like Benito have found a financial pipeline in an unlikely and controversial place: cell phone towers.
This year, Hillsborough schools could rake in more than $230,000 from leases on towers.
But some parents say the money isn’t worth it. They say the school district is being irresponsible and gambling with students’ health without conclusive evidence that towers are safe.
“It’s literally pennies a day that each child is getting for having a cell tower there,” said Mary Meckley, who wants the district to remove the tower from her son’s school, Pride Elementary in New Tampa. “They’re hardly getting any money.”
Try telling that to cash-strapped administrators who can’t afford basics like copy machines and student textbooks…
Frank said if schools don’t cash in on this growing market, another institution — a nearby church, recreational facility or hospital — will. As long as there are cell phones, she said, towers will be around us.
“What people tend not to realize is that they’re in the neighborhoods already,” she said, rattling off a list of places across Hillsborough with towers. “They’re everywhere…
Sources:
This is just my opinion, but it seems to me that installing a cell tower near a church, recreational facility or hospital is just as deplorable. Installing a cell tower near children in a learning environment where those so-called “weak” microwaves have never been tested is unconscionable.
Yes, we are bombarded on a regular basis by all kinds of energy. The problem is that medical experts like neurosurgeons are implicating the microwave infrastructure, namely the current psychosocial practice of holding cellphones against your skull, and brain tumors. This subject is discussed at the post on Colony Collapse Disorder Honey Bee Research.
The medical research studies say that children are the most susceptible to the dangers of a microwave infrastructure because their skulls are still too thin. Imagine what spending six to eight hours a day, nine to twelves months out of the year next to a cell tower will do to your child? If your child uses a cellphone on a regular basis, this at least doubles his/her exposure to microwave radiation.
Obviously, the cellphone companies are actively surveying schools, churches, recreational facilities, and hospitals to open new cell tower leases. This much is obvious; it’s the obvious arguement that the cellphone company rep is using on his prospects to open that lease, “You had better take that lease or someone else will - you could be making tons of money…”
If you ask me, a truly creative school district would search for more educational opportunities for the children while making money. For example, cash in on the green industry while kids learn green technology. Did you see the examples of technology for converting trash into energy at
Earth Day Remembers North Pacific Trash Gyre? This is only the tip of the iceberg.
What the school official could do is actively search green companies who want to host their technology on the school site as a commercial display for their market. At the same time, the kids would take tours of this green technology (by company reps) and learn the basics of making this a clean, healthy, civilised world, not only for future generations, but for that child’s generation who is learning green technology.
Of course, this means that school officials can’t just sit on their hands all day hoping that green technology reps will magically appear at their doorstep - like those microwave infrastructure reps. School officials would have to be proactive in researching companies that are willing to set up a lease as well as help educate kids.
Anyone who is willing to install cell towers near people, especially children, is suffering from ego, greed, and flat out carelessness. Anyone who is willing to install cell towers next to children in their learning environment probably hate children. Of course, they’ll deny it, but if you get to know such a person, you will find out quickly that they don’t give a damn.
I’m hoping that you do. You can help make a difference by telling the US Congress how you feel about installing a hidden microwave infrastructure that just might put the final nail in the coffin of the advancement of humanity, especially our children. Please sign the following petition:
Urge Congress on EMF Safety, FCC Must Change Exposure Guidelines for Microwave Radiation Exposure
The following 4 steps should be taken:
1. Mandate the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) revisit its exposure guidelines for radiofrequency radiation (RF) immediately.
2. Repeal Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which took away the rights of state and local governments to stop the erection of cell towers and wireless antennas in their communities based on “environmental” grounds (defined by FCC as “human health”).
3. Declare a national moratorium on further wireless infrastructure build-out, including the Wi-Max roll-out currently underway, a joint venture of Sprint, Time Warner Cable, Google, Clearwire and others.
4. Establish cell phone and wireless-free neighborhoods, transportation options, government buildings, and public spaces; require employers to establish wireless free zones; and, mandate the removal of cellular and wireless technologies from public schools and their properties.
We ask members of Congress to act swiftly, decisively and with full integrity to stem the emerging electromagnetic radiation pollution increasingly permeating the lives of the American people. There has never before been a public health issue as important. Please sign this petition.
Related links:
- Power Lines and Cancer Risk
- Does the Federal Gov’t Really Believe there are no Dangerous Bioeffects from EMF Exposure?
New Form of Electronic Test Helps Show
Early Signs of Energetic Health Imbalances.
These Energetic Imbalances May Be Showing The Future of Your Health…
One thing you’ll be weary of is keeping your cell phone in your pocket all the time once you see these videos about this cutting edge testing method. Click Here >> Electro-Dermal Screening and the Cell Phone Test.
Addendum:
16 February 2009 by HealingMindNMore ignominious behavior from cellphone industry execs: Industry Makes Pitch That Smartphones Belong in Classroom (excerpt)
…On Tuesday, Digital Millennial will release findings from its study of four North Carolina schools in low-income neighborhoods, where ninth- and 10th-grade math students were given high-end cellphones running Microsoft’s Windows Mobile software and special programs meant to help them with their algebra studies.
The students used the phones for a variety of tasks, including recording themselves solving problems and posting the videos to a private social networking site, where classmates could watch. The study found that students with the phones performed 25 percent better on the end-of-the-year algebra exam than did students without the devices in similar classes.
The students also were allowed 900 minutes of talk time and 300 text messages a month to use outside of class. Teachers monitored the messages and reprimanded students if any of the activity violated the school’s standards.
Critics point out that access to such communications usually detracts from the overall time students spent thinking about studies. That is why at least 10 states, and many other school districts, have outright bans on cellphones on school premises.
“Texting, ringing, vibrating,” said Janet Bass, a spokeswoman for the American Federation of Teachers, the nation’s second largest teachers’ union. “Cellphones so far haven’t been an educational tool. They’ve been a distraction.” Ms. Bass says it is “almost laughable that the cellphone industry is pushing a study showing that cellphones will make kids smarter,” particularly during a recession that is crushing the budgets of many school districts.
For the industry, however, there is a lot of money at stake. Schools now spend hundreds of millions of dollars on computers to provide an average of one computer for every three students, at a cost of $1,000 a year for each machine….
If the kids want to get into computer related industry and that computer is teaching them how to do it, the $333.33/year per kid is worth it.As far as the cellphones, Let me get this straight. We’re not even going to consider the likelyhood that cellphone execs would want to install a tower on school grounds for “easier access” to their network. Let’s talk about the drain on humanity known as cellphones.
Cellphones have never, nor will they ever be conducive to education - especially when you include brain softening chit-chat as a reward on school grounds.
There’s nothing wrong with using the cellphone for necessities. When you do use it, use it like a “communicator” from the old Star Trek, AWAY from your head.
So, you want to record yourself solving problems? A teacher did that (using his own video camera) in middle school with a bunch of other kids when I was taking algebra. The videos remained anonymous and we would talk out the problems at the same time as we wrote. Then all the kids would watch the videos on a TV and we’d all learn from each other, the best thinking process for kids to solve algebraic problems.
There are video cameras that are much cheaper than cellphones. Why not just use video cameras? (Because a simple video camera doesn’t make any money for the cellphone companies! Video Cameras don’t require subscriptions!)
You also want to post videos to a private social networking site? That can still be done with with a simple video camera. The other private social networking site is your classroom. That’s right. This is the time when the teacher can choose kids at random to solve problems for everyone else to see.
Do you understand how great that works? This means that everyone has to be prepared to solve problems on their homework because you never know when you’ll be called.
That’s mean? Screw you. That’s what I had to do. Noone needed cellphones when I was going to grade school - and most of the kids I knew had went on to higher levels of algebraic analysis by the time they started high school. Guess what the reward was for great performance? Higher Grades.
What more of a reward do you want from school? More brain melting, nonsensical chit-chat on the cellphone?
Dim witted kids don’t deserve cellphone priveleges, much less their parents. If you have to call someone on the cell to tell them you love them, then do it, then hang it up. Discuss how much more you love them in person. You have important business. Fine. Keep it in your office away from prying ears.
Don’t make nonsensical chit-chat at the store discussing which loaf of bread or which bottle of wine to buy with the damn stupid blue tooth sticking out your head.
Rejoin the human race and be humane to yourself as well as others. Use your mind. Don’t melt your brain.
Posted in Organisations, Poison Spectrum, Bioenergetic Spectrum | Print | No Comments »





Get nutrients from food. Whole foods are better than dietary supplements.
